Yearly Archives: 2012

Baby Sister (Tainted Love)

Posted on December 19, 2012 at 2:53 pm

What a massive bummer: it’s not trash, goddammit, it’s a romance. Yeech. Usually cool Scorpion Entertainment, for some unknown reason, has released Baby Sister (original title: Tainted Love), a 1983 made-for-TV movie starring Phoebe Cates, Ted Wass, Pamela Bellwood, and Efrem Zimbalist, Jr, that originally aired on the ABC network in 1983. Within the first ten minutes of Baby Sister, all signs pointed to a TV-safe but enjoyably pulpy little romp…before it went all pear-shaped and turned distressingly serious and moony and even clean-minded, for god’s sake. Pity, considering sexy Cates never looked naughtier. The re-title (and an ITC logo at the head) might explain a potential shorter running time here―is this possibly an overseas theatrical print? No extras for this okay-looking transfer.

Just-turned 19 (I’m going to faint…) Annie Burroughs (Phoebe Cates) has dropped out of college and is headed to L.A. to stay with her older sister, Marsha (Pamela Bellwood). Marsha, the distracted, harried owner of a soon-to-open art gallery, has a long-term (but no ring) relationship with David Mitchell (Ted Wass), a doctor who says he wants to go into private practice, but who really wants to stay at his rundown barrio clinic. Apparently owning the only luxury seaside apartment in Santa Monica that has no air conditioning, perfectly glowing Annie arrives at sweating-like-a-pig Marsha’s apartment and meets shirtless David…and that’s everyone’s tummy starts feeling funny. Soon, David is giving baby sister a job at his clinic, and running on the beach with her, and hanging out at her crappy, rundown rented house, and going to the opera with her, while Marsha finds more excuses to keep busy at the gallery while not letting David get busy with her. You know what happens next.

 
I’m not going to spend a lot of time on Baby Sister…because there’s not a lot of things worth discussing in it. Hey, look; I’m sure the people involved in Baby Sister or Tainted Love or whatever meant well and were sincere in making this little TV romance. It’s all perfectly respectful and quiet and tasteful and palatable to even the most prudish viewer. The acting is appropriately dialed-back, while the story, as old as the hills, is predictably plotted and worked out, with everyone making nice at the end as they act noblely and unselfishly to make sure no one’s feelings get hurt. Stiff-upper lips are stiffen as bridges are crossed, misunderstandings cleared, and old hurts healed. Fine. It’s a perfectly ordinary romance, conventional and bland as all get-out, with zero surprises but with no major missteps, either. Great.

 
And that’s why I despise it. Okay, now…maybe everything I’m looking for in Baby Sister and can’t find is in those (possibly?) missing 10 minutes or so, according to the other run times I’ve seen for Tainted Love. If that’s the case, chalk up my anger to a bad post edit job. If not…I really hate Baby Sister because it’s a knowing little tease with zero payoff. I don’t like getting my chain jerked (you can take that anyway you want…). If you’ve got a TV movie from 1983, I know there are going to be limits as to what you can show; I know Phoebe Cates isn’t going topless here (if she did, Baby Sister would get our highest ranking here at DVDTalk). I’m not talking about nudity or simulated humping. What I’m talking about is filth. Salacious garbage. Tittering innuendo and smarmy-but-G-rated sexploitation. Don’t give me a movie featuring Phoebe Cates in all her 20-year-old glory, putting her in shorts and tube tops, turning off the air conditioning so that in every scene there’s a delicious sheen of sweat on her perfectly tanned limbs…and then have her be a “good girl,” of all things. What the hell is wrong with you?

 
The screenwriters, Jo Lynne Michael, Paul Haggard Jr., and Susan Title, and director Steven Hilliard Stern (some big-screen misfires like Running and The Devil and Max Devlin, but a lot of good TV, like The Ghost of Flight 401, Portrait of a Showgirl, Mazes and Monsters), know exactly what they’re doing to us (and what they’re promising) when they repeatedly linger lovingly over Cates’ form (at one point, Stern gives us a helpful pan up the entire length of Cates’ backside; he can’t even resist a bouncy no-bra highlight when she wears a choking high-collar Holly Hobby dress). And they know what they’re teasing us with when they start the story slow, building up our expectations for a blow-out when wuss Wass finally makes a move on Cates. This isn’t your basic Waltons storyline. After all, it was called Tainted Love for chrissakes. And I want that “love” tainted (well…actually “love” isn’t necessary). You’ve got this perfectly-cast little sexpot Cates; you dress her down in provocative clothing; you oil her up so she actually shimmers in every scene; you set up the can’t-miss dirty story so she’s stealing her sister’s man…and then you say, “screw you” to the viewers; we’re not going to give you what we teased and promised…here’s a cheapjack love story that June Allyson would have been proud of? What in god’s name for? That is criminal negligence.

 
The DVD:

The Video:
Since DVDTalk was sent a screener check disc for Baby Sister, no video or audio ratings will be given until we receive a final shelf product.

The Audio:
Ditto the audio.

The Extras:
No extras.

Final Thoughts:
A bland and ultimately tiresome cheat. Don’t tease me with the luscious Phoebe Cates set to steal her sister’s man…and then give me a sweet, tender, boring love story. Unless you’re a Cates completist…skip Baby Sister.

Paul Mavis is an internationally published film and television historian, a member of the Online Film Critics Society, and the author of The Espionage Filmography.

0

Posted in Fun and Games

What Happened To Jack Kerouac? Collector’s Edition

Posted on December 15, 2012 at 2:53 pm

Good luck being beat today…. Shout! Factory has released What Happened to Kerouac?, a new two-disc collector’s edition of the well-received 1986 documentary on the iconic Beat author, now supplemented with over two hours of bonus material. In addition to vintage television and audio performances by Jack Kerouac reading his own work, What Happened to Kerouac? features interviews with Beat main players like Allen Ginsberg, Gregory Corso, William S. Burroughs, Michael McClure, and John Clellon Holmes, with Gary Snyder, Carolyn Cassady, and Steve Allen among others offering their takes on Kerouac, as well. While What Happened to Kerouac? deliberately stays neutral (…or deliberately vague?) in coming up with its own thoughts on Kerouac, the ideas and theories and remembrances expressed in the many interviews by those who knew Kerouac first-hand, are fascinating, and best of all, the poetic prose of Kerouac, as read by Kerouac, is mesmerizing. All is forgiven when the beat gets laid down. As an added bonus, the filmmakers have included over two hours of additional clips from their original interviews, giving us more insight into Kerouac…or at least insight into those talking about Kerouac.

I originally saw What Happened to Kerouac? back in 1986, when it played at a little art cinema I used to frequent, and while I didn’t remember too many specifics prior to this DVD showing up, a few moments of the interviews in What Happened to Kerouac? stayed with me, in particular, the video and audio clips of Kerouac performing his work (that being the first time I had heard or seen him “live,” if you will). It’s not the purpose of this review to give a history lesson on the Beat Generation (after all, if you’re reading this review, you already know about it), nor will I burden anyone with yet another trite, clichéd account of a young college kid coming to Kerouac and finding him uniquely touching and meaningful. Suffice it to say, when I discovered Kerouac back in school, I read everything by him. I haven’t gone back to him since, but I suspect I might find the experience a bittersweet one, delighting again in the sound and sheer beauty of the way Kerouac rhapsodized…but also becoming sufficiently bummed in the knowledge that, unlike a college kid, I’d have little chance today to be able to experience, the way he did, the America he described―an America that was already long gone 25 years ago when I read Kerouac, anyway. After all, how does one “get lost” in their search for God and kicks, as Jack and Neal did, in the forgotten corners of a shrinking, frightened America that has every sidewalk and road covered by CCTV cameras, where hedonistic pleasure is as instantaneously available as clicking a mouse or getting a prescription med refilled, and where even the most beaten-down of the beat can briefly amuse themselves playing games on their free Obamaphones?

 
As for What Happened to Kerouac?, at first glance, one might be tempted to give the filmmakers credit for not taking a side when it comes to explaining Kerouac’s evolution (or devolution) as a writer and unwilling celebrity once he published On the Road. Directors Richard Lerner and Lewis MacAdams let the interviewees speak for themselves when it comes to exposing the various facets of Kerouac’s personality and art. Of course, viewpoint in a documentary comes from omission as much as inclusion (obviously, there is no such thing as an “objective” documentary), so Lerner and MacAdams ignoring any reputable critics of Kerouac’s work leaves What Happened to Kerouac? decidedly one-sided when it comes to evaluating his impact (tellingly, the inclusion of Jack’s notorious drunken appearance on William F. Buckley’s Firing Line is the closest the doc comes to critical confrontation of Kerouac himselfnot his work―and even then justifications, not evaluations, seem to dominate the interviewees’ interpretation of the event). Still, as oral history, What Happened to Kerouac? is spot-on; we get to hear the actual people involved in the Beat Generation and in Kerouac’s life tell us in their own words their feelings and thoughts on the man and the movement. However, as documentary, What Happened to Kerouac? plays it exceedingly safe (and perhaps a tad too reverential), content to just let the cameras role, letting the interviewees do all the heavy lifting.

 
That’s why the new bonus “doc,” if you will, The Beat Goes On, is a much more honest piece precisely because it’s not really a documentary at all. It’s merely a compendium of extra, leftover footage from those original interviews, offering more random but fascinating insight into Kerouac’s life and work. It doesn’t have What Happened to Kerouac?‘s brief title biographical cards that weakly try to frame the interview snippets, nor What Happened to Kerouac?‘s limply cobbled-together time line that leave us wondering about big chunks of Kerouac’s life (we never get an exact picture of Jack’s trips with Neal that inspired On the Road, nor do we get much mention of Jack’s activities inbetween finishing On the Road in 1951 and its publication in 1957). While I could have done without the opening segment from the Naropa Institute in 1982, where the “political fallout of the Beat Generation” is discussed by the likes of Ginsberg, Timothy Leary, and Abbie Hoffman (jesus how did that obnoxious, self-satisfied blowhard fool so many people?), the rest of the snippets are great (particularly from myth-busting realists like Carolyn Cassady, Gregory Corso, and Herbert Huncke). The only thing missing from this bonus disc is obvious: more Kerouac. It’s a shame the filmmakers couldn’t include more audio and video of Kerouac laying down his beat; after all, that’s why all the other people are talking here.

 
The DVD:

The Video:
The full-screen, 1.33:1 video transfer for What Happened to Kerouac? looks okay, with a sharpish picture, average color, and no anomalies I could spot.

The Audio:
The Dolby Digital English mono audio track is average, as well: relatively clean, with little hiss. No subtitles or closed-captions available.

The Extras:
See above.

Final Thoughts:
With so many different takes on Kerouac’s makeup from the assembled interviewees here, it’s probably impossible to definitively say what, exactly, happened to Jack Kerouac once he achieved his unwanted/wanted fame. Ultimately, though, are those facts, whatever they may be, as important as his work? Kerouac might have said they’re equally important, so…. If What Happened to Kerouac? makes you want to seek out Kerouac’s work, it succeeds, then, as a doc (on a doc’s most basic level). I’m recommending What Happened to Kerouac?.

Paul Mavis is an internationally published film and television historian, a member of the Online Film Critics Society, and the author of The Espionage Filmography.

 

Posted in Fun and Games

Deadman Wonderland: The Complete Series

Posted on December 13, 2012 at 2:53 pm

The Show:

In a nutshell: There goes 325 minutes of my life I’ll never get back.

When Deadman Wonderland the manga was released, I checked out the first few volumes and enjoyed what I read. The characters were fun, the atmosphere was dark and disturbing, and the story had a mystery backing it that made it a compelling read. When I heard the show was being made into an anime, naturally I was excited. Most manga-to-anime adaptations these days are faithful to the material, after all. When the complete series from FUNimation was dropped on my lap I popped the first disc in without hesitation.

Deadman Wonderland is grotesquely violent for the sake of being so. Granted the manga was pretty much this way, but it seems exacerbated by the animation somehow. Blood flies, body limbs get ripped off, and there’s even a scene that involves someone having an eyeball ripped out of their socket while their alive to experience it (we even get to see first person glimpses during it). It’s dark from start to finish, and though that’s not necessarily a bad thing (I didn’t find it off-putting), it just feels a little forced at times.

The dialogue is also laden with swears for no reason at all, other than to swear. It’s almost as though the script was thrown together by a Tourette syndrome afflicted angst-filled youth mouthing off to everyone he hates in the world. It’s downright silly most of the time, but I digress.

The show starts out serenely with a young boy named Ganta studying up on a school trip to some murderer’s row amusement park known as Deadman Wonderland. Things seem to be hunky dory until a strange man in red appears outside the classroom and mutilates everyone in the room except for Ganta, who gets to witness the traumatic event and even have his friend’s head roll by him. Ganta is convicted for the crime, even though no evidence existed that he had anything to do with it, other than being left alive. Thus Ganta winds up in the prison he was studying before his world was turned upside down.

Deadman Wonderland is a harsh place. It’s where the hardest of the hardest criminals go to die. Each prisoner wears a collar that emits a poison if they don’t eat an antidote in the form of “candy”. In addition to that, the prisoners are forced to partake in “games” for public audiences that often end with them dying in some ghastly manner. Sliced in half by flying axes? Fried to extra-crispy on an electric grid? Impaled on spikes 100 feet below? Yup, it’s all there. And Ganta is stuck in the middle of this hell-hole. I understand that someone thrust into that position would naturally lose their cool, but Ganta spends the whole damn show crying and sniveling about how weak and pathetic he is. Ganta, buddy, I get it – you suck as a protagonist.

Joining Ganta in this twisted version of Disney World is a white-haired girl from his past named Shiro, and a slew of other “cast members” such as You, the doube-agent, and Senji, a vicious killer with a mysterious power. There are others as well such as the operator of Deadman Wonderland and the size G bust prison warden who doesn’t mind slicing prisoners at a moment’s notice. The cast works well for the most part and they support the story and development of Ganta well enough. For the most part the cast is likeable, except for Ganta, who, you know…sucks.

I’d be remiss to continue this review without mentioning the “mysterious power” that Senji possesses, which is also known as a Branch of Sin. You see, Deadman Wonderland is home to individuals known as Deadmen who were survivors of an event known as the Red Hole some years ago. These Deadmen can use the very blood in their body as weapons and are the main underground attraction in the amusement park. Ganta happens to be one the Deadmen and his power forces him into a life and death struggle against other inmates, but also brings him ever closer to seeking vengeance against the Red Man.

Sounds pretty intriguing, right? Well, what if I were to tell you that at episode 12 the show just stops. It climaxes and climaxes and builds question upon question and then just ends. That’s right! There’s no freaking ending for the show!! The entire reveal that the plot was building towards, the introduction of characters towards the end, certain dialogue, and particular events all end in absolutely nothing. I don’t mind a few loose ends here and there to leave one guessing, but what the f**k? It’s this simple fact that leaves me to feel that I wasted my time watching the show. The episodes leading up to the finale (if you want to call it that) were great and the beginning of the show was especially good, but when the second disc ends and you pop in the third disc only to find extra features you’re going to feel robbed.

This isn’t FUNimation’s doing. They licensed a good show, and it’s not their fault the production of the series stopped at episode twelve, but that doesn’t change the fact that the series leaves one feeling particularly bitter at the end. I mean, damn, it’s like going to dinner and the waiter takes your plate away halfway through and leaves you the bill. Actually, it’s worse; in this case it’s about 6 hours of your life that will never see closure. I guess you could buy the manga if you wanted to see what happens in the story, but I suspect precious few will do that. Will there be a second season? I doubt it, but you never know. If there is and it continues from this spot, okay, but if not I’d think twice about buying this collection.

Video:

Deadman Wonderland is presented on DVD with its original 1.78:1 aspect ratio and has been enhanced for anamorphic playback. The show looks very good in this outing with clean lines, smooth animation (for the most part), and vibrant colors. There’s no aliasing and only sparse amounts of examples of artifacts in the image, though these are in darker areas of the show such as moments underground in Section G or the night scene with You and Shiro. Otherwise the show is nice and crisp and is very pleasing on the eyes, which is ironic considering all the gore and whatnot.

Audio:

Japanese stereo and English 5.1 surround are what you’re going to find here for audio selections. In both cases the dialogue performs well, though I tended to prefer the Japanese track because I was sick of all the swearing in the English dub. The Japanese track was flat, which really dulled out some of the action, even though bass was utilized well. The surround mix for the English track brought a little more oomph to the proceedings and provided a more dynamic soundstage, though it wasn’t as prevalent as it could have been.

Extras:

Promotional videos for the show’s release in Japan, original commercials, and clean animations are here for features. There are also two audio commentary tracks with the English cast that proved to be fun to listen to. The localization crew had a fun time putting this track together and they talk about their experience at length.

Final Thoughts:

I’ll be honest, if I wrote this review based on the first 3/4 of the show I would have made it an easy recommendation. The concept is wild, the action is solid, and the characters are fun (though Ganta…not so much). Unfortunately the ridiculously open ending completely ruined the show and sends viewers off on a sour note and feeling short-changed. I mean, the show just ends. ‘That’s it. Nothing more to see here folks!” It’s inexcusable and forces a rental recommendation or the show to only be picked up by collectors of the manga. Even then it’s almost not worth it.

Check out more of my reviews here. Head on over to my anime blog as well for random musings and reviews of anime, manga, and stuff from Japan!

Posted in Fun and Games

Terra Nova

Posted on December 11, 2012 at 2:53 pm

The Show:

In much the same way that friends of mine were telling me I should start watching the show The League (and to those of you, I thank you), some of those same people were telling me I should give the Fox show Terra Nova a try. With Steven Spielberg serving as one of the show’s Executive Producers, it can’t be a completely bad idea, can it? The show does possess an interesting premise to say the least.

The show is set in 2149 in a world where fresh air is hard to come by and family creation is monitored by the government. Jim Shannon (Jason O’Mara, One For The Money) is a detective who is married and has three children, one outside the maximum according to the government. His wife Elizabeth (Shelley Conn, How Do You Know) is a doctor and has informed Jim (in jail for population control violations) that she and the kids have been selected to participate in Terra Nova, which is a new colony. Terra Nova is somewhat different in that one travels back in time to 85 million B.C. to enjoy what it’s like to breathe fresh air, rather than cut it with a knife and fork in the polluted 22nd century. While Elizabeth’s background was already prized, Jim’s comes to the attention of Nathaniel Taylor (Stephen Lang, Avatar), Commander of the colony, and the first to arrive to it. Taylor uses Jim to help maintain security of the colony against rebel forces called “The Sixers.” The Sixers’ main goals are to mine the resources of the planet at the time, specifically the various dinosaur types, for the purpose of corporate gain.

The first few episodes to set the exposition for the story and get some backstory behind the characters is intriguing, in a Swiss Family Robinson meets Lost kind of way, but with dinosaurs! Jim does a remarkable job of not missing a stride with his family, considering he was in jail for two years and the kids don’t immediately blubber when they see Dad free and out in the wild. There is some initial friction between Jim and his oldest son Josh, though it tends to resolve itself. He acclimates to the colony just as miraculously for an escaped prisoner as well, come to think of it. He is part of the framework for most of the episodes and serves as a window into the colony for the outsider.

Oddly enough, is part of the problem with the show. O’Mara is somewhat limited in range with the character in a show full of limitations. The show largely confines itself to the colony, which would seemingly go against the nature of exploration that human nature would tend to have. Sure, sturdy weaponry and gates prevent the dinosaurs from invading the compound, but once you keep all the characters inside the gates, things get a little bland to be honest. There are various supporting characters, some of them antagonists, who get thrown into the mix from time to time, but they are hardly a threat. If they were, they’d be in charge of the colony. The other issue is that of the conflict with the Sixers. With limited personnel and weaponry, they tend to have a little more muscle than disbelief can carry. Like if Shawn Bradley was their center and low post presence, for instance. But their battle, while limited in scope, is also limited to small pockets in and possibly near the colony. Come on people! Dinos or not, you’ve got legs, cars, even guns! Give them a spin.

Perhaps in retrospect, I should have taken the Terra Nova title more literally than I should have. Maybe by involving the dinosaurs in scenes as threats, the natural progression of keeping non-Sixers in or near the compound was a logical one, but that leaves the story to try and move things along, which it does little more than coast on. While it seems like something that would appeal to some of my geek DNA strands, my internal mechanism that judges entertainment was a lot more effected when I watched the show, which for the show’s sake was a bad thing.

The Blu-ray Disc:
The Video:

Fox shows Terra Nova off in all of its 1.78:1 anamorphic widescreen glory, with the results being quite nice. The show balances the practically shot footage with the computer-generated explosions and dinosaurs quite nicely. Set against the Australian locations the greens look nice and natural and possess no noticeable saturation issues. Flesh tones also look natural and the source material is clean as can be, with little image noise, crushing or edge enhancement to speak of. Looks about as good as I was expecting.

The Sound:

Dolby Digital 5.1 surround for all episodes, which is good because the show makes ample use of all six channels. Channel panning and directional effects are evident and abundant, and subwoofer activity is frequent during the episodes, rounding out the low end nicely. Dialogue is consistent in the center channel and requires little adjustment, and the listening experience seems to reflect a fairly high production value during it. It was much better listening material than I expected.

Extras:

To the credit of those at Fox, the decision to keep extras even on a half season of a cancelled show was a nice surprise. Disc One has eight deleted scenes (9:51) which did not do all that much for me, but “Director’s Diaries” (34:30) was the better piece, showing off the work put into the pilot. It shows the pre-production involved, including the set and costume designs put into the show, along with the prop dressing and creature robotics. The actors are slowly introduced into it and talk about their opinions on the shoot and the locations. The impacts of the weather on the production are given some attention, and some inherent on-set mucking about is also highlighted. All in all it is a nice inclusion.

There are no extras on Disc Two, and Disc Three has two deleted scenes (1:10) which are forgettable. Disc Four includes a commentary on the finale with Lang and executive producers Brannon Braga and Rene Echevarria which is an interesting if uneventful track. “Mysteries Explored” (8:59) talks about some potential clues in the show and the larger themes in it, along with some character backstories. It is sprinkled with a spoiler here and there but is interesting. “Cretacious Life” (10:10) shows the dinosaurs of the show and their part in it, and the cast talk about the creatures. A gag reel (3:09) wraps things up in a nice tidy bow. For online users, you can access a website where you can create your own ending for the show, but you can make your own joke there.

Final Thoughts:

Terra Nova is interesting conceptually, but from an execution standpoint confines itself and relies on performances and character choices that are unconvincing more often than not. Technically it is quality both from a sound and picture perspective, and on the extra material side of the house has a good deal of material for a cancelled show. If you are curious to see what the fuss was about or are a fan of science fiction or action in your television content, it is worth a spin.

Posted in Fun and Games

Santa Claus Conquers the Martians: Kino Classics Special Edition

Posted on December 9, 2012 at 2:53 pm

SANTA!
CLAUS!
Hooray for Santy Claus! You spell it
SANTA!
CLAUS!
Hooray for Santy Claus! Yah Yah for Santy Claus!
He’s fat and round, but jumpin’ jiminy,
He can climb down any chim-i-ney!
When we hear sleigh bells ring,
Our hearts go ding-a-ling!
Cause there’ll be presents under the tree!
Hooray for Santy Claus!
Now all year long at the North Pole,
He’s busy making toys!
But he knows just what you’re doing,
So you better be good girls and boys!
Hang up that mistletoe!
Soon you’ll hear ‘Ho! Ho! Ho!’
On Christmas Day you’ll wake up and you’ll say,
Hooray for Santy Claus!

Come on…it’s not that bad and you know it. Kino Classics has released public domain favorite, Santa Claus Conquers the Martians: Special Edition, the 1964 Saturday matinee/TV Christmas cult classic from Joseph E. Levine’s Embassy Pictures, starring John Call, Leonard Hicks, Vincent Beck, Bill McCutcheon, and little Pia Zadora in her first of many horrible movies. A TV staple at Christmas time for years and years before it was suddenly “discovered” by MST3K, Santa Claus Conquers the Martians has acquired genuine cult status as “one of the worst movies of all time,” a label that’s easy to lob at it…but one it doesn’t really deserve. Kino scores a pretty nice print of the movie here, adding in a fun bonus of archival movie theatre Christmas greetings, commercials, and Christmas-themed cartoons. A perfect stocking stuffer for the kids or someone you hate…or both.

 
The North Pole, 1964. KID-TV reporter Andy Henderson (Ned Wertimer) is interviewing Santa Claus (John Call) on the status of this year’s Christmas schedule. Santa shows Andy a few new toys, including a Martian doll, drunkenly calls one of his reindeer “Nixon,” and introduces Mrs. Claus (Doris Rich), who squeals and runs off camera when she discovers she’s on TV. Meanwhile, on the cold, distant planet Mars, cool, calculating eyes watch this transmission from Earth TV and wonder. Children Bomar and Girmar (Chris Month and Pia Zadora) have no idea what a doll is, or what Santa means by giving the doll “tender loving care.” Their lives are strictly regimented; Electronic Teaching Machines are hooked up to the children’s brains at birth, with “play” and “fun” strictly forbidden. Their father, Chief Kimar (Leonard Hicks) blames feel-good Earth TV for “confusing” the children, affecting their sleeping and eating patterns, but he’s convinced by his wife Momar (Leila Martin) to go with the other fathers into the forest and seek out the “Ancient One of Mars,” Chochem (Carl Don). Chochem, sadly reminding them that he saw this coming hundreds of years ago, advises them to get the children a Santa―that’ll fix ’em up. So Kimar, Hargo (Charles Renn), Rigna (James Cahill), and evil Voldar (Vincent Beck) travel to Earth to kidnap Santa, first taking little Billy and Betty (Victor Stiles and Donna Conforti) to make sure they get the real Santa. Voldar wants no part of this plan; he fears contamination from the weak Earthlings, but Kimar prevails and takes Santa and the children to Mars. Luckily, Santa has an ally in lazy, stupid Martian Dropo (Bill McCutcheon), who loves Santa and Christmas, and who wants to help Santa return to Earth.

 
No, I don’t think Santa Claus Conquers the Martians is a great movie, or a “misunderstood classic” ignored by critics…but I don’t think it’s one of the 50 worst films of all time, either, as it was labeled by Harry and Michael Medved in their same-named book back in 1978 (I’ll bet Medved, whose books were the main catalyst for a whole sub-industry, gets pissed whenever he reads that MST3K somehow “discovered” celebrating horrible movies…). An easy (and now clichéd) target whenever bad movies are mentioned, Santa Claus Conquers the Martians has traveled well beyond the bounds of movie criticism and into iconographic tokenism. Its very name stands for something now, just like Plan 9 From Outer Space, that’s entirely outside the reality of experiencing it firsthand. You don’t even have to find someone who’s actually watched it to get the standard reaction; as long as they’ve heard of the title, you can mention the name and people will laugh and snort, feeling included in on the joke. While lists of “worst films” compiled by authors like the Medveds, or lampooned and mocked by performers like the MST3K gang, are undeniably fun (I have all of their books, well-thumbed and worn, sitting right above my desk, while treasured VHS tapes of MST3K are neatly boxed up)…they’re about as useful as all those AFI “100 Best…” lists that drive movie lovers crazy. Sure, most viewers are going to agree on a handful of titles on both ends of the spectrum (who isn’t going to say Plan 9 and Gone With the Wind belong on those lists, respectively?), but movie criticism, despite what the semiotics dopes will tell you, is entirely subjective and about as scientific as phrenology. It really does come down to “I liked it,” and “I didn’t like it,” with the level of “seriousness” attributed to the criticism directly proportional to how “fancy” and intellectualized the argument is, or how cleverly written is the review. A lot of critics hate to hear that (especially the ones stupid enough to actually spend money studying it)…but it’s the truth.

 
So when critics write that Santa Claus Conquers the Martians is one of the worst movies ever made, I go back to when I was a kid, watching it religiously every Christmas…and I don’t remember it being so bad. Your worst movie pick or the Medveds’ worst movie pick, is someone else’s genuine pleasure, and if the argument in support of it is valid and intellectually and emotionally honest, well, then…your list means nothing. And vice versa. Of course, the time factor is another element that complicates evaluating it (viewing age then and now). Santa Claus Conquers the Martians is a kids movie, after all. The filmmakers may or may not have intended that parents be entertained here, but clearly the focus is on satisfying children. And with any kids movie, you’re automatically compromised as an adult reviewer. How many times have you shown your kids a movie or TV show you loved when you were young, only to have them bail after five minutes…and vice versa, when they’re screaming in laughter at some Nick tween abomination, while you’re looking for the escape hatch? It’s all about viewer context.

 
Watching Santa Claus Conquers the Martians again, and this time not just bemusedly as a Christmas ritual, but with the intent of reviewing it, I found it quite…satisfying, strangely. If you want to get really silly, you can even make an argument that serious subtexts can be found in Santa Claus Conquers the Martians (yeah…I wrote that). No one ever mentions that the movie’s director, Nicholas Webster, was no lightweight (very heavy stuff like ABC Close-Up! documentary series, East Side/West Side); it’s not impossible to think that Webster couldn’t have picked up a little on scriptwriter Paul L. Jacobson’s weirdly intertwined concerns: the affects of television on kids, and the Cold War. By 1964, there had been a lot of articles written about the deleterious effects of children watching too much TV; what parent back then didn’t pause as Kimar worriedly states that his kids don’t sleep or eat, and that “their only interest is watching meaningless Earth programs on the video” (Newton Minnow certainly would have agreed)? Have no fear, though, TV lovers; the broadcaster-as-American-patriot reasserts himself when you realize that those little Russian Commie bastards Martian children―cold, calculating, brainwashed, godless little savages who don’t even know how to love a doll for chrissakes―can be saved by a combination of mainstream American values reflected through network television “Earth programs” and a Jesus surrogate Santa Claus, whose laughter and love reaches across geopolitical and ideological boundaries planets.

 0
See? I told you “film criticism” was horsesh*t. Anyway, as an adult, you don’t have to make a big deal over enjoying the movie for what it is: just a silly little Christmas movie for kids, no more or less annoying than most (have you ever seen Olive, the Other Reindeer or One Magic Christmas? No? You need to, then, to recalibrate your reading of Santa Claus Conquers the Martians). Most reviewers negatively comment on the movie’s spartan budget, but I find those wonderfully cramped, cheapjack sets fit right in with the movie’s deliberately comic book schematic. That one claustrophobic North Pole shot, and the Chochem forest scene, are actually quite well lit by future The Swimmer and Pretty Poison cinematographer, David L. Quaid; it helps here to see a better sourced print (the colors are fairly vibrant in this transfer, compared to most of the public domain sources I’ve seen that look blown-out and almost black and white, making the movie look even more chintzy…if that’s possible). I always find the solemn intensity of the Chochem scene quite strange in a Christmas movie (you can tell the director really means it), but that’s an anomaly in a movie whose tone is set by what appears to be one totally hammered Santa (I don’t know what’s funnier―John Call’s dirty, mean laugh, or his completely disinterested line reading when asked if Martians exist: “Well who knows,” he sighs, looking down at the floor). The special effects run the gamut from stock footage of U.S.A.F. maneuvers to one shot of Kimar’s rocket that looks like a strawberry burrito with a Bic® lighter stuck in it. It’s certainly fun to see mustachioed Vincent Beck assaulted by all those cool Marx® toys (the scene looks remarkably like all those Monkees episodes he would soon appear in). Best of all…who can resist that crack cocaine speedball of a theme song, from Hoop Dee Doo‘s Milton DeLugg, as it’s shouted in snotty off-key brio by (reportedly) Pia Zadora and some other brats? I read a lot of reviewers saying they can’t stand that insanely catchy theme song…but we know they’re fibbing, don’t we? It’s worth watching the movie just to hear that song, over and over and over again….

1 2
The DVD:

The Video:
The full-screen, 1.33:1 transfer for Santa Claus Conquers the Martians looks about as good as I’ve ever seen it. Colors are pretty vivid, the image is sharp, and screen anomalies (scratches, splices, dirt), while heavy at times, aren’t distracting considering what you’re watching.

The Audio:
The English mono audio track is serviceable, with some pops and hiss, but nothing you wouldn’t expect. No subtitles or closed-captions.

The Extras:
Very, very cool. Shout! has gathered together various vintage Christmas-themed footage for Santa’s Cool Holiday Film Festival (they couldn’t call it Santa’s Cool Christmas Film Festival…because what other holiday does Santa link up to???). Included here are Shari Lewis and Lambchop delivering a seasonal message; America’s favorite family The Nelsons shilling for sponsor Eastman Kodak, Max Fleischer’s Christmas Comes But Once a Year and Rudolph, the Red-Nosed Reindeer toons are included; a Castle Films Santa short subject from 1950 pops up; Abbott & Costello and driver Charles Laughton plead for Christmas seals; 1951’s Howdy Doody’s Christmas is here; along with various movie theatre Christmas greetings, in color and b&w, from the 50s and 60s. Terrific Christmas nostalgia.

Final Thoughts:
Yes, it’s goofy and bizarre and creepy and annoying at times…but it’s also a movie for kids, and since kids are goofy and bizarre and creepy and annoying at times, it’s a good fit for them this Christmas time. And you might enjoy it, too, if you forget all that jazz about it being one of the worst movies ever made―you can find far worse crap at the multiplexes right now…. I’m highly recommending Shout!’s Santa Claus Conquers the Martians: Special Edition.

Paul Mavis is an internationally published film and television historian, a member of the Online Film Critics Society, and the author of The Espionage Filmography.

3 4

Posted in Fun and Games

« Previous PageNext Page »